---
# Binding Price Ceiling
<img src="binding-price-ceiling.png" width="2103" style="display: block; margin: auto;" />
---
# Quick Test
---
# Non-Binding Price Ceiling
<img src="non-binding-price-ceiling.png" width="2176" style="display: block; margin: auto;" />
---
class: clear, middle, no-scribble
.font200[
Case Study: Rent Controls in New York City
]
---
# Short-Run Effects
<br>
<img src="rent-controls-short-run.png" width="1664" style="display: block; margin: auto;" />
---
# Long-Run Effects
<br>
<img src="rent-controls-long-run.png" width="1664" style="display: block; margin: auto;" />
---
class: clear, middle, no-scribble
.font200[
Price Floor
]
---
<!-- \begin{frame}{Price Floor} -->
<!-- \begin{judgement} -->
<!-- {price floor}{a legal minimum on the price at which a good can be sold} -->
<!-- {agricultural policies; minimum wages} -->
<!-- {price floors are imposed due to a belief of the rulers that for some reason the market price (equilibrium price!) is too low and this is against the public interest} -->
<!-- \end{judgement} -->
<!-- \end{frame} -->
# Price Floor
price floor |
|
|
a legal minimum on the price at which a good can be sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
agricultural policies; minimum wages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
price floors are imposed due to a belief of the rulers that for some reason the market price (equilibrium price!) is too low and this is against the public interest |
---
# Evaluation of Price Ceilings
<!-- \begin{list}{\faBalanceScale}{\leftmargin=3.9em \labelsep=1.5em} -->
<!-- \item The major consequence of imposing a price ceiling is a shortage (deficit) at the respective market -->
<!-- \item The competition between buyers to get the deficit good can take the form of waiting in queues (spending time with uncertainty of success), creating personal relations with the sellers, bribing the sellers and even creation of networks of law-breaking to evade the law -->
<!-- \item The buyers who get the good at cheaper price might be better off but those who don't get it at all are worse off -->
<!-- \item The buyers who do get the good are not necessarily the ones who value it the most -->
<!-- \end{list} -->
| |
The major consequence of imposing a price ceiling is a shortage (deficit) at the respective market |
| |
The competition between buyers to get the deficit good can take the form of waiting in queues (spending time with uncertainty of success), creating personal relations with the sellers, bribing the sellers and even creation of networks of law-breaking to evade the law |
| |
The buyers who get the good at cheaper price might be better off but those who don't get it at all are worse off |
| |
The buyers who do get the good are not necessarily the ones who value it the most |
| |
|
| |
|
---
<!-- \begin{frame}{Evaluation of Price Ceilings} -->
<!-- \begin{list}{\faBalanceScale}{\leftmargin=3.9em \labelsep=1.5em} -->
<!-- \item The deficit gets worse over time since the price elasticities of both demand and supply increase over time -->
<!-- \item By imposing price ceilings the rulers deprive the society from the opportunity to use the price as a mechanism to assist in the communication and the discovery of the most valuable use of society's scarce resources -->
<!-- \item To correct the negative effects of the deficit, the rulers are tempted to impose other policies, further increasing the scope of government intervention in the market economy -->
<!-- \end{list} -->
<!-- \end{frame} -->
# Evaluation of Price Ceilings
| |
The deficit gets worse over time since the price elasticities of both demand and supply increase over time |
| |
By imposing price ceilings the rulers deprive the society from the opportunity to use the price as a mechanism to assist in the communication and the discovery of the most valuable use of society's scarce resources |
| |
To correct the negative effects of the deficit, the rulers are tempted to impose other policies, further increasing the scope of government intervention in the market economy |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
---
class: clear, middle, no-scribble
.font200[
Price Floor
]
---
# Binding Price Floor
<img src="binding-price-floor.png" width="1664" style="display: block; margin: auto;" />
---
# Quick Test
---
# Non-Binding Price Floor
<img src="non-binding-price-floor.png" width="1664" style="display: block; margin: auto;" />
---
<!-- \begin{frame}{Evaluation of Price Floors} -->
<!-- \ -->
<!-- \begin{list}{\faBalanceScale}{\leftmargin=3.9em \labelsep=1.5em} -->
<!-- \item The major consequence of imposing a price floor is a surplus at the respective market -->
<!-- \item The competition between sellers to sell their production can take the form of expensive actions to attract buyers despite the higher price such as advertising and strategies to effectively lower the price of the product (e.g. giving a ``free" loaf of bread with every bottle of milk) -->
<!-- \item The sellers who get to sell the good at higher price might be better off but those who remain with unsold production are worse off -->
<!-- \item The producers who do sell their production are not necessarily the ones who can produce it with the lowest cost -->
<!-- \end{list} -->
<!-- \end{frame} -->
# Evaluation of Price Floors
| |
The major consequence of imposing a price floor is a surplus at the respective market |
| |
The competition between sellers to sell their production can take the form of expensive actions to attract buyers despite the higher price such as advertising and strategies to effectively lower the price of the product (e.g. giving a ``free'' loaf of bread with every bottle of milk) |
| |
The sellers who get to sell the good at higher price might be better off but those who remain with unsold production are worse off |
| |
The producers who do sell their production are not necessarily the ones who can produce it with the lowest cost |
| |
|
| |
|
---
<!-- \begin{frame}{Evaluation of Price Floors} -->
<!-- \begin{list}{\faBalanceScale}{\leftmargin=3.9em \labelsep=1.5em} -->
<!-- \item The revenues of the sellers as a group might be higher if the demand is price inelastic but the price elasticity of demand tends to increase over time and this might lead to decreasing revenues for the sellers -->
<!-- \item By imposing price floors the rulers deprive the society by the opportunity to use the price as a mechanism to assist in the communication and the discovery of the most valuable use of society's scarce resources -->
<!-- \item To remove the surplus from the market, the rulers are tempted to buy it, further increasing the scope of government intervention in the market economy -->
<!-- \end{list} -->
<!-- \end{frame} -->
# Evaluation of Price Floors
| |
The revenues of the sellers as a group might be higher if the demand is price inelastic but the price elasticity of demand tends to increase over time and this might lead to decreasing revenues for the sellers |
| |
By imposing price floors the rulers deprive the society by the opportunity to use the price as a mechanism to assist in the communication and the discovery of the most valuable use of society's scarce resources |
| |
To remove the surplus from the market, the rulers are tempted to buy it, further increasing the scope of government intervention in the market economy |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
---
<!-- \begin{frame}{Conclusion} -->
<!-- \epigraph{The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.}{Ronald Reagan} -->
<!-- \end{frame} -->
# Conclusion
.pull-right-2[
_The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help._
Ronald Reagan
]
---
class: clear, middle, no-scribble
.font200[
Taxes
]
---
<!-- \begin{frame}{Taxes} -->
<!-- \epigraph{Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.}{Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.} -->
<!-- \epigraph{In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.}{Benjamin Franklin} -->
<!-- \end{frame} -->
# Taxes
.pull-right-2[
_Taxes are what we pay for civilized society._
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
]
.pull-right-2[
_In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes._
Benjamin Franklin
]
---
<!-- \begin{frame}{Taxes} -->
<!-- \begin{judgement} -->
<!-- {taxes}{money that the government collects from households and firms in order to raise government revenue and to restrict the consumption of certain goods} -->
<!-- {value added tax (VAT), corporate income tax, personal income tax, excise duties, tariffs} -->
<!-- {tax policy has many moral and practical implications -- some people see taxes as a theft, indirect taxes seem to be better than direct taxes with regard to encouraging saving (and investment!) but are also considered regressive} -->
<!-- \end{judgement} -->
<!-- \end{frame} -->
# Taxes
taxes |
|
|
money that the government collects from households and firms in order to raise government revenue and to restrict the consumption of certain goods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value added tax (VAT), corporate income tax, personal income tax, excise duties, tariffs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tax policy has many moral and practical implications -- some people see taxes as a theft, indirect taxes seem to be better than direct taxes with regard to encouraging saving (and investment!) but are also considered regressive |
---
# Tax Imposed On Sellers
<img src="tax-imposed-on-sellers.png" width="1664" style="display: block; margin: auto;" />
---
# Tax Imposed On Buyers
<img src="tax-imposed-on-buyers.png" width="1664" style="display: block; margin: auto;" />
---
<!-- \begin{frame}{Evaluation of Taxes} -->
<!-- \begin{list}{\faBalanceScale}{\leftmargin=3.9em \labelsep=1.5em} -->
<!-- \item The main consequence of taxes is that the quantity of the product that is produced, exchanged and consumed decreases -->
<!-- \item In the general case, the shrinkage of the market means that the society is worse off because some of the potential gains from trade are not realised -->
<!-- \item The extent of the shrinkage depends on the size of the tax and the responsiveness of buyers and sellers to price changes (PED and PES) -->
<!-- \item In some specific cases (demerit goods), the shrinkage of the market may actually increase social welfare -->
<!-- \end{list} -->
<!-- \end{frame} -->
# Evaluation of Taxes
| |
The main consequence of taxes is that the quantity of the product that is produced, exchanged and consumed decreases |
| |
In the general case, the shrinkage of the market means that the society is worse off because some of the potential gains from trade are not realised |
| |
The extent of the shrinkage depends on the size of the tax and the responsiveness of buyers and sellers to price changes (PED and PES) |
| |
In some specific cases (demerit goods), the shrinkage of the market may actually increase social welfare |
| |
|
| |
|
---
<!-- \begin{frame}{Evaluation of Taxes} -->
<!-- \begin{list}{\faBalanceScale}{\leftmargin=3.9em \labelsep=1.5em} -->
<!-- \item The distribution of the tax burden (the tax incidence) DOES NOT depend on the intentions of the ruler because it is effectively determined by the relative elasticities of buyers and sellers and not by the ruler's decision to impose the tax on the buyers or on the sellers -->
<!-- \end{list} -->
<!-- \end{frame} -->
# Evaluation of Taxes
| |
The distribution of the tax burden (the tax incidence) DOES NOT depend on the intentions of the ruler because it is effectively determined by the relative elasticities of buyers and sellers and not by the ruler's decision to impose the tax on the buyers or on the sellers |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
---
class: clear, middle, no-scribble
.font200[
Conclusion
]
---
# Conclusion
| |
The size of the government and the extent of the government intervention is a politically charged topic |
| |
By intervening in the market economy the government "takes sides" and "picks winners and losers", creating a lot of controversy |
| |
The majority of economists agree that taxes (especially on demerit goods) are acceptable means for governments to obtain revenues and influence buyers' behaviour but oppose price controls as a very inefficient way to help certain groups in society |
| |
Even the economists who agree that taxes are legitimate may have a lot of disagreement about the size of the tax burden and the structure of the tax system because of differences in normative views |
| |
|
| |
|
---
class: clear, middle, no-scribble
.font200[
Bonus Content
]
---
class: clear, middle
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/s2Ks3_O1i74?si=khPBHb1LkoJjZuIn&start=237" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
---
# Questions?
<br>
<br>
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/font-awesome/4.7.0/css/font-awesome.min.css">
</head>
<body>
<i class="fa fa-question" style="font-size:240px; position: absolute; right: 250px; width: 300px;"></i>
</body>
</html>
---
# Thank You!
<br>
<br>
<i class="fa fa-smile-o" style="font-size:240px; position: absolute; right: 250px; width: 300px;"></i>